Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Bullock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:28, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Ahmed Bullock

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lacks notability. Very few reliable, independent sources, and those mention him in passing. (Oh, and obviously not 19th-century). Fram (talk) 10:21, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:21, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:21, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:21, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I think that "first English Imam of Oxford" certainly makes them notable.
 * (Oh, and obviously not 19th-century) -- clearly an error, but hey, it's a Wiki, feel free to fix it. --Masssly (talk) 11:00, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, as long as reliable sources don't think that that is a notable claim, then it doesn't matter what you or I think. For me it's trivia, for you it's notable, neither are of any importance in an AfD. Fram (talk) 11:41, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 12:05, 4 August 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete being the first head of a mosque in a particular city is not at all close to being a sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:14, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:26, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, the only coverage I could find of him that might possibly be SIGCOV was this article, but I could find no indication that that website has an editorial team. I do not think "first Imam of Oxford" is a position which passes any particular SNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:45, 13 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.