Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Cali Cigal (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete per consensus and as an unsourced BLP per WP:BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Ahmed Cali Cigal
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unsourced since January 2008. This was kept at the last AfD in 2008 with the main argument being "there's lots of GHits". Having looked for both spellings of the name, I could not find significant coverage at reliable sources. Fails WP:MUSICIAN. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 09:59, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —--  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 10:03, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions.  —--  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 10:03, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, agree with Phantomsteve. Checked out the 'loads of hits on Google' that were mentioned in the last AfD, none were substantial, certainly not enough to establish notability. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. J04n(talk page) 01:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are apparently several ghits that mention the subject's name. However, I am not able to verify the content due to the language barrier. I have viewed several sites and they appear to present blogs and press releases. Again, though, I am not able to ascertain the accuracy of my assessment due to the language barrier. Focusing on policy, sources have been requested for almost three years without response. In my opinion, the lack of acknowledgment and/or compliance with WP verification policy in this case should result in deletion. Cindamuse (talk) 10:14, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.