Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Fatimah Bisola


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Ahmed Fatimah Bisola

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article about a government commissioner of no special notability - one of many. Fails WP:GNG. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 11:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:59, 1 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – The Grid  ( talk )  17:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting again as previous relist yielded no further discussion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liamyangll (talk to me! &#124; My contribs!) 00:08, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I think previous AfD discussions of Nigerian state commissioners have ended with deletion unless they were particularly notable for some reason. This one doesn’t seem to be. Mccapra (talk) 12:24, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per references provided it meets the General Notability Guidelines WP:GNG apart from being commissioner, also commissioners in Nigeria are basically notable. An@ss_koko(speak up)  19:10, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  Sennecaster  ( Chat ) 13:10, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  Sennecaster  ( Chat ) 13:10, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:29, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete.PER NOM.Best Regards.--- ✨Lazy Maniik✨  13:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC) Sockpuppet of blocked user . ✗  plicit  11:59, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't have detailed coverage in reliable sources. Mtpos (talk) 14:32, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per WP:NPOL, Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels are presumed notable. I don't think that this is limited to elected officials; judges are often appointed, and it would be odd to read the guideline in a way that would include elected judges and exclude appointed ones. Since Nigeria is a federal republic, I believe that the guideline extends a presumption of notability to individuals who have held statewide office in Nigeria, even if that office is appointed. Therefore, I presume this individual to be notable. While Nigeria's official language is English, I'd expect there to be local media and other sources written in local languages that would be hard to find. As a result, I don't see a weak fail on GNG as disqualifying when WP:NPOL indicates that we should presume notability. I believe that keeping the article would be best. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:09, 7 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.