Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Raza Khan (Pakistan)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Ahmed Raza Khan (Pakistan)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No notability. It was created by an account with only 3 edits and that too in this article.  sami  talk 08:26, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 08:59, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 08:59, 18 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete fails to meet basic GNG. --Saqib (talk) 09:04, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. No indication the subject meets WP:PROF or the WP:GNG. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 12:11, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Agreed. Purely promotional. Someone has mistaken Wikipedia for LinkedIn. Quis separabit?  17:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:Prof not passed. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:34, 18 December 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete. It is similar to an article that I created a while ago. The end result was, that according to WP:Academic criteria no.6, only principals/presidents or professors who have significant notability can be mentioned. Ma&#39;az (talk) 04:37, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * delete fails WP:GNG. Störm   (talk)  11:47, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Strong delete that such a weak article on someone who is not even near notability or passing the guidelines for academics has survived 4 years is a disgrace to Wikipedia. Actually, criteria 6 only applies to people who are presidents of universities/tertiary colleges, and maybe heads of truly major subdivisions of them, such as top ranked law and medical schools. It also only would apply to such institutions that have a certain level of academic respectability and cultural impact. It almost never if not totally never applies to secondary level educational institutions, for this criteria to apply the place has to be clearly and without debate not a diploma mill, and deep issues of actual campus governance and organization should also be studied. While I can see for example in the US some community college presidents passing this criteria, I think if someone wants to make an argument to delete an article on the president of a community college, arguing that it is not a "major academic institution", they should be allowed to present arguments for this position, and we should not assume that term default includes all tertiary institutions.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:57, 21 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.