Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Rushdi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Neil N  talk to me 14:18, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Ahmed Rushdi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article includes unsourced content, bias and dead links. HFM Expert (talk) 13:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep Neither of those is a reason to delete an article. If the article needs fixing, then fix it. I see from the article's edit history you've had a content dispute with User:Umair Aj: deletion is not the way to fix this. Have you read WP:Dispute resolution? The Mighty Glen (talk) 13:44, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - the subject is a celebrated and a renowned Pakistani singer. I don't see the logic behind this irrational AfD. --Saqib (talk) 13:54, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Disruptive nomination with no basis in policy from user involved in edit war at article. Previously attempted to "speedy" as "attack page"... Purely disruptive. -- Begoon 14:01, 5 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.