Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Zitouni


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure)   [[User:CanonNi ]]  (talk • contribs) 04:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Ahmed Zitouni

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The article does not meet the notability requirement NBV2010 (talk) 19:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 10.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 19:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: I could not find sufficient coverage to justify notability per WP:NAUTHOR.  Coco bb8  (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 20:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per newly found sources  Coco bb8  (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 11:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep additional sources at 1 and 2 as well as numerous Google book references such as 3 (pp.21-22). Mccapra (talk) 21:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Algeria.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: This smells of retaliation since the nom had the article about them deleted via AFD. UtherSRG (talk) 00:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Reopened and relisted as an uninvolved admin in my individual capacity, per WP:NACD. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen&times; &#9742;  08:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. In addition to the sources already mentioned, which satisfy general notability, Zitouni's work has also been the subject of peer-reviewed academic research. Cortador (talk) 20:36, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep I believe the book and the paper listed above show that NAUTHOR 1, 3, and 4c have been met, in addition to the GNG. Any one of these would be enough to keep. The full text of the paper Cortador cited can be found here. Toadspike   [Talk]  08:43, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Cocobb8 In light of the sources provided by Mccapra and Cortador, would you consider there to be sufficient coverage to justify notability per WP:NAUTHOR? Toadspike   [Talk]  08:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I've just searched Google Scholar for "Ahmed Zitouni" and found this, which looks like an old review of one of his novels, and this book, which has a whole chapter on three authors, one of whom is Zitouni, starting on page 131. Toadspike   [Talk]  08:54, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * , I would, yes! Thanks for the ping, not sure how I had missed those sources!  Coco bb8  (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 11:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.