Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmet Yakupoğlu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. j⚛e deckertalk 15:30, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Ahmet Yakupoğlu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not appear to be notable. No claim to notability. Thanks,  Lixxx235 Got a complaint? 14:17, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, as nom. Thanks,  Lixxx235 Got a complaint? 14:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Struck duplicate !vote above. The nomination itself is the !vote. However, feel free to comment all you'd like. NorthAmerica1000 10:45, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: The Culture and Tourism government award may indicate notability but Google Translate is not enough. Someone with Turkish language and background is needed to evaluate whether it is important enough to indicate notability. AllyD (talk) 06:16, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 09:50, 16 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment He changed surname. You can see a Google Books reference with his previous surname (See article). He is a notable traditional artist, one of a few left on Ottoman arts. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 19:07, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The problem about this article is it has been written with a bad English and possibly by a contributor that is not very familiar with WP rules and pactices. Now I added another reference in the article and vote (sic) Keep. I hope more people will work on this stub-article (it does not even have sections) and help to make it much better. Regards. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 21:58, 16 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 06:35, 26 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per Why should i have a Username?Wikiguys12 (talk) 23:18, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Information - Another reference, with his former surname, in Google Books. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 18:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, all issues raised for speedy deletion were resolved. --CeeGee 18:26, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.