Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aidan Coughlan

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedied by author request. android 79  02:44, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Aidan Coughlan
The reason for deleting this page is due to the lack of noteablity as well as sketching information provided. I'm not sure if this qualifies as a vanity page or not. It seems to be insignificant. Davidpdx 9/17/05 7:00 (UTC).


 * Agreed Hi, this is Aidan Coughlan, just agreeing with ya there. I didn't put up the page myself, it was probably one of the shallower of my friends (who was fairly overawed by the fact that I was in the paper, she thought this qualified me as some sort of celeb! Go figure!) so it's definitely not a vanity thing - although i had no objections to it being up, despite it being a tad odd, once it started getting vandalised I realised it's better off coming down. Aidan


 * Delete. I'd personally call it a nn-bio speedy, but I imagine such a tag could be controversial.  Friday (talk) 17:26, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article is well written, though short.  There is quite a lot of Wikipedia content which is less notable.  -- Reinyday, 22:54, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet notability standards as journalist or author. Every single columnist is not encyclopedic. --TM (talk) 00:48, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy per subject's request below. --TM (talk) 01:18, 18 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete . Speedily if possible; not a notable journalist and barely known even among Herald readership. How about I move it to my personal page instead? -- AidanCoughlan, 02:02, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy right, that info is all on my user page now, so the page itself can be done away with whenever someone gets the chance. sorry for the hassle. AidanCoughlan 03:05, 18 September 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.