Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aidana Otorbaeva


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Consensus among participants is that this article passes WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Aidana Otorbaeva

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Procedural nomination in lieu of a malformed nomination by User:MercuryOxide, whose original reasoning was "Only has one sentence and 11 sources". I am neutral; further information below. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Football,  and Kyrgyzstan.  Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 23:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
 * This article is, at the time of writing, less than six hours old (in my opinion, this is too soon for AfD). It was created at 18:13 UTC. Most of the sourcing is in Russian. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 23:58, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep No valid criteria cited for deletion. It may be a micro-stub, but that is not a legitimate reason for deletion. Looks like a clear failure of WP:BEFORE. See also WP:EAGER. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:12, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per above. Best and most well known player in Kyrzgystani female football history. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 03:52, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:49, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - even from Limon and RFERL alone, this passes WP:GNG. It's quite remarkable that a female footballer from Kyrgyzstan gets coverage like this in more than one language, which, if anything, strengthens my wish for this to be kept. Quite a few of the sources are largely interviews but there's enough independent content on some of these for it to pass. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:58, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:30, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources above which show notability. GiantSnowman 13:21, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, proper BEFORE not done.--Ortizesp (talk) 19:47, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG. Jacona (talk) 18:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.