Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aidas Ardzijauskas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:41, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Aidas Ardzijauskas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about long distance runner and firefighter. There is no claim of significance nor any reason they are notable. I have been unable to find any international awards for either of his career paths. The 2 references are local coverage and do nothing to prove how they satisfy WP:NTRACK or WP:GNG. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:30, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:30, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:31, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete no claim of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:24, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom Not clear how the subject is notable now there are thousands of firefighter now not clear why he is notable and even as a runner not clear how he has passes WP:NTRACK and also fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:49, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable distance runner. Subject does not satisfy specific notability criteria for track & field athletes per WP:NSPORTS, and there is no evidence of significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable secondary sources to satisfy the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 12:08, 16 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.