Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aiheuism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete; author confirmed article is original research. Johnleemk | Talk 18:03, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Aiheuism
Original research. Google test lists 16 results and webster dictionary doesn't list that term Mecanismo | Talk 23:08, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Per this link, it seems that this term refers to a religion in a work of fiction. Delete. ESkog | Talk 01:44, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * It was unfortunate that I chose to mention those ideas in a work of fiction by name. Aiheuism is not a religion, though it was a religion in those stories.  Christmas and its customs did not originate in Charles Dickens' CHRISTMAS CAROL either, but it was mentioned in a work of fiction...  With that being said, Aiheuism is a widespread belief but simply not evangelical.  There are no real books on it, just a couple of papers, and certainly no entry in Webster's.  No need has been seen and no attempt been made.  Perhaps I will write "the book" on Aiheuism someday because it is an interesting reflection on how some ecologists see the world, but certainly not just to substantiate an article in Wikipedia, absolutely no offense intended.  My main strength is in editing animal welfare and zoological articles, and I'll pretty much stick to that from now on where there is no chance of offending the Internet Gods.  That being said, and no I am neither angry nor hurt, but your method of accepting articles absolutely ensures you'll never see anything worthwhile in WikiMedia FIRST....as a scientist I find that prospect just a little chilling....just a thought.  Happy Holidays, and do whatever you see fit with the article.  John H. Burkitt 00:22, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: No, you won't see anything in Wikipedia first. As an encyclopedia, we are by design a secondary source - we require verifiable references before something belongs here. Good luck working on your information in other places, and thank you for your contributions elsewhere in Wikipedia. (ESkog)(Talk) 19:36, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Article text will still be in the history. (accessable to administrators) Banana04131 02:31, 16 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.