Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aim For The Head


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 08:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Aim For The Head

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable band that fails WP:MUSIC. The article is incomplete, and has been for months and months, there are no sources given. Having one member who was previously in a notable band does not confer notability to this one. Reyk YO!  20:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Info added 03.10.08 - Hi, Ive just read this deletion notice, but can confirm that as I am aware Aim for the Head are a genuine band, I have watched them many times. I am also informed that they are due for a band meet on Sunday to decide the full line up. I believe that the information you are talking about was added yesterday 02.10.08. You can check out their myspace at www.myspace.com/aimfortheheadmusic. Please keep the page. It will be updated when the line up is confirmed on Sunday 05.10.2008 Cheers.AFTH fan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.8.62.20 (talk) 10:22, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete unless reliable sources can be added to verify that this band meets the notability guidelines for musicians. The only remote claim to notability that I see is that Sam Brown used to be a member of Existend, but as point 6 notes, redirects are often appropriate in such cases and, significantly, Existend also does not verify per WP:MUSIC. The band broke up with no album, and all sources are primary. I've attempted to look for reliable sources myself, but failed to locate anything. (See "Sam Brown" & "Aim for the Head" at google.) Under ordinary circumstances, I'd propose a redirect here, but since I also cannot locate reliable sources to verify the notability of Existend, I believe deletion may be more appropriate. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. I agree with Moonriddengirl's rationale for deletion.  ♫ Cricket02 (talk) 03:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.