Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aimee Cheng-Bradshaw


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Asia's Next Top Model (cycle 3).  MBisanz  talk 00:55, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Aimee Cheng-Bradshaw

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NMODEL. The person seems to have been a contestant of Asia's Next Top Model (but not a winner) and hosted a local television show (which I am not sure is notable). Except for a couple of tabloid-y articles and, other sources contain trivial mentions of her. (Note, the appearance in a single episode of "Style and the City" seems to have no secondary sources to back it up). Add to that the COI editing, I feel it is WP:TOOSOON to have an article about her. Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:27, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak to moderate keep - The amount of news coverage seen here, as well as the amount of modelling work she has done, covered e.g. here and by some of the article's sources establish that she is at least minorly notable, but perhaps not notable enough to have her own Wikipedia article. If not kept, I think a better option would be to redirect to Asia's Next Top Model (cycle 3). Linguist 111 talk 16:32, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep, as seems slightly notable from google searches. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 18:36, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment I had a look at the news coverage. There are a total of 19 results, out of which
 * 2 results do not mention her name anywhere in the article ,
 * Chinese source . Trivial mention as part of a gallery
 * No mention, except for a photo
 * 7 results from Indonesian/Philippines (non-English) containing just a trivial mention of her name (since she was a participant in Asia's Next Top Model) ,,,,,,.
 * Self published source
 * Trivial mention that she was one of the hosts ,
 * Trivial mention in a routine television listing ,
 * Short QnA Interview along with co-host of a new show (article seems to be promoting the new show).
 * 2 sources talk about the article subject in detail, although the former is from a tabloid source and the latter seems to be advertising the programme (see last line of article) ,
 * Weighing this against other articles, I am unable to conclude that the article subject is notable enough to deserve an article. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 21:24, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Are you fluent enough in the other languages to conclude the mentions are trivial? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.7.31.140 (talk) 08:07, 23 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - meets WP:GNG. Hmlarson (talk) 17:45, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and Redirect to Asia's Next Top Model (cycle 3) - No evidence of notability to warrant an article however as she seems to be most known for Next Top Model it makes sense to redirect, The deletion is to prevent it being recreated by some ip/sock however I'll leave that bit up to the deciding admin, – Davey 2010 Talk 23:29, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:39, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:39, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:39, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:39, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 12:01, 19 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now and Redirect as this is still questionable for solid independent notability, perhaps best known for the show for now. SwisterTwister   talk  22:48, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 08:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.