Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aimee Richardson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. Rlendog (talk) 00:42, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Aimee Richardson

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

A child actress, aged fourteen according to. This article was in a poor state before I cleaned it up, finding in the process that there do not appear to be reliable sources covering her, which makes her fail WP:BIO. There are a great number of of articles that mention her in her role in Game of Thrones, but no (reliably sourced) biographical information or critical coverage that I am aware of, only self-published / fan-published content such as the page linked to above. Per WP:BLP and WP:V, we should not include articles about living people about whom so little is known through reliable sources.  Sandstein  14:10, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Very weak delete per WP:TOOSOON. It seems quite likely that sufficient coverage will eventually exist for this young actress, but my searches reached a similar result to Sandstein's.  In addition to the Titancon bio Sandstein mentions, here is a brief piece from The County Down Spectator and Ulster Standard.  Probably not quite enough for a BLP of a minor.  If something a bit more substantive turns up, I'll readily change my !vote. I'd also note that there is another Irish performer also named Aimee Richardson, who is in her late 20s, has Down syndrome, and is the lead voice of Punky (animated series).  See e.g. --Arxiloxos (talk) 14:51, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect for now to Game of Thrones, the series for which she can be properly sourced. Shortness of her careeer fails WP:ENT, and lack of coverage for anything else makes this a WP:BLP1E... but we can at least send readers to the one place where it makes sense to have her mentioned and sourced.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:27, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Sounds reasonable. I do expect she'll become notable at some point.  Sandstein   03:57, 8 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect as noted above. She will quite possibly develop a sufficient body of work to merit an article in the future. Stormbay (talk) 03:04, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.