Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aimi Tomori


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:57, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Aimi Tomori

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Some random Japanese model. Does not meet WP:GNG. Does not have any REAL sources and nothing in English. Makes no sense. Someone probably made this because they are some "Otaku" obsessed with her. MayVenn (talk) 02:03, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 October 5.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 02:24, 5 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep - complete lack of deletion rationale. You haven't explained why the sources aren't reliable and don't represent significant coverage of the subject. The fact that they aren't in English is irrelevant.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 03:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Although this user has been opening AfDs for articles by me and (as here) my collaborator on Pile (voice actress) to make a point, this is one where they likely are right. There are no independent sources (although this is not obvious!). I doubt she's notable; I don't know Japanese or how to research and assess her notability. The article was created by a newbie whom I'm helping out, who is not familiar with all of our policies (note: I know from off-wiki communications that the article creator will be offline for some time). &mdash;innotata 04:41, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 04:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 04:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 04:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete (probably): The sources don't amount to much, not because they are in Japanese, but because they are blogs, passing mentions, 4th place in some beauty contest sort of thing. Personally I don't see any harm in including obscure personalities (compared with the harm of junk articles like Korean influence on Japanese culture), but I don't see any real evidence of notability. Imaginatorium (talk) 05:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per Imaginatorium and innotata.--Mark Miller (talk) 07:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Blog sources, N not inherited for performing in same event with notable bands like MomoClo and more per above closed the deal of speedy keeping this pointy and spotty nomination (sorry Stalwart).  野狼院 ひさし  Hisashi Yarouin 11:41, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * No need to apologise H. If we need to have a discussion about this then we should have a discussion about this. I just don't think it should be in this context, as retaliation for something else. Maybe that's policy wonkery, but I don't like giving a harassing and disruptive editor exactly what they want. Take away the soapbox.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 12:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Try to find more intormation and sourcing though she might me well know in Japan Scottwin (talk) 13:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I checked the usual places in Japan for independent news on gravure idols--sports papers, entertainment sites, etc.--and could not find much other than a few mentions. Nothing significant. Her Japanese page was made by an SPA, and the English one is just a translation of that. Perhaps her only verifiable claim to fame is multiple appearances on a late-night variety show on a minor network, but unless we can find other RS or she appears on other shows in major roles, she doesn't pass WP:ENTERTAINER. Michitaro (talk) 15:16, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.