Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aimy in a Cage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Move to draftspace (creator of page agrees to this action, clear consensus)

Aimy in a Cage

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This movie has just started filming, but I can't find significant discussion of it in reliable sources. Google search of brings up some social media postings, calls for volunteers, torrent sites (even though it's not even made yet), and 42 "unique" results. ... disco spinster   talk  18:27, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

The film wraps Production on April 25th, 2014 and will be released in September. While you are correct that there are social media postings and calls for volunteers, I have posted the IMDB page as an official Reference, which is an extremely reliable source. : ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bruhlcity (talk • contribs) 19:43, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete/userfy for now. The problem is that while we can pull some information from IMDb, it isn't considered to be a reliable source that shows notability. RS are sources that are independent of the subject that cover the film in depth. IMDb can be edited by anyone and is, at best, seen as a database type listing. For example, recently I had two instances where someone faked the information at IMDb. One was where someone tried to claim that she was a Grammy presenter, that she was going to play She-Hulk, and so on. The other (if I'm remembering correctly) tried to claim that Ang Lee was going to co-direct his film. That's why we can't use IMDb as a source and why in the end it is at best a database entry. This is just WP:TOOSOON for it to be on here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:39, 17 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Soft delete. Move to draftspace for for a while. Some minor sources do exist outside of IMDB, but mostly due to the cult following of the film's leads. This islikely to grow. The question becomes one of whether or not coverage pf the principals meets the cautions of WP:NFF paragraph 3. I think that for now, no. Simply TOO SOON  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 19:52, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Userfying isn't a bad option. I'll add that to my delete nom. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:11, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Alright, I agree that we need some more reliable sources. How about we move it into Draftspace? We wrap production in THREE days. Plus we are sending out press releases now for more coverage on the film. I anticipate, just like MichaelQSchmidt, that our sources will begin to grow rapidly, very soon. I suggest that we not delete the page, rather move it to Drafts so we can make it live once our other sources come pouring in. Bruhlcity (talk) 20:17, 22 April 2014 (UTC) Bruhlcity
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.