Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AirDee (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  12:07, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

AirDee
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Some mentions, some unreliable sources (like House of Pop). Can't find any in-depth coverage about them in reliable, secondary, independent sources. Fails WP:GNG. Already been deleted twice in the last 3 years through AfD.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and South Africa.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:04, 18 April 2023 (UTC)


 * There’s is other coverages. The reason it was deleted in past was due to the confusion with “ArrDee” the UK rapper.
 * This one is AirDee from South Africa. He is one of the legendary producers in Africa and we feel he deserved a spot this time.
 * However thank you for the review, this page was moved from draft to article because we were hoping to get it revised by some of the best on here.
 * Thank you PenJuluka (talk) 12:45, 18 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete and SALT this time as well. Contrary to what the person above said, all three nominations are for the same person, the South African producer/singer AirDee, as can be seen via mentions of his work with Locnville. This guy's articles have already been deleted twice because as a producer, he only ever appeared in the credit lists of other people's works, which is a curse that producers face. This time, his status as a behind-the-scenes and non-notable producer has not changed. He has since moved into creating his own music, but his one solo song so far has not attracted significant notice and has only been hyped at unreliable sites that reprint his management's promo announcements. This should also be salted to prevent yet another unneeded recreation of the article. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 19:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete promo BLP, fails GNG and BIO. Sources in article is are promo, and BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV).  // Timothy :: talk  06:53, 23 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.