Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AirLex Animations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:15, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

AirLex Animations
An animation company with no Google hits. Special:Contributions/Lexington makes it obvious that this is part of an advertising campaign.

Delete as advertising. Bo Lindbergh 06:19, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. See also Clair De AHHH, a stub for a cartoon by these animators which is also being considered for deletion. Movementarian 06:34, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * See also Articles for deletion/SNTW. Bo Lindbergh 06:36, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advertising. Mat334 09:00, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advertising, non-notable. Technostalgia
 * Save. Not trying to advertise. Site has been submitted to Google, and waiting for results. If wanted, I will delete the link! I just wanted to archive info about them, not advertise. And whats wrong with creating a stub about the animations? Are there not stubs for Web Comics and other cartoons? Fell free to edit the page delete what you feel is advertising, but please do not delete the page completly. Lexington
 * Comment. It is not a notable animation group and does not warrant an entry on Wikipedia.  When a webcomic they produce becomes popular, then they can be listed.  Movementarian 07:53, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'm sorry. I was under the impression that the purpose of Wikipedia was to archive information, but I guess I was wrong. I did not realize that it was a large popularity contest, meant only for people who show up in Google. I mean, of course! Anything that doesn't show up in Google must not be information, eh? Well, I guess that Technostalgia shoulden't have any info on him/herself in Wikipedia, seeing as it doesnt come up in Google. I can just see the very purpose of Wikipedia crumbling right now. Lexington
 * Comment. I suggest you check out What Wikipedia is not.  Some notablity should be established before entry to this encyclopaedia is allowed.  As you can see Technostalgia does not have an article, but as with all Wikipedians has a user space.  It is not the same thing.  Please do not take this nomination as a personal attack (I am assuming by your passion for this article's inclusion you have a vested interest) and do not get discouraged from participating in Wikipedia.  Movementarian 20:11, 10 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete for being very non-notable. Recreate when you come back in the top 200 Google hits for "animation" Turnstep 15:55, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable group. Stifle 23:27, 11 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.