Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AirTags


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  17:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

AirTags

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 10:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 10:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 10:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Citations to not provide adequate confirmation for intent to release product. Without an announcement from Apple, even with evidence to support branding and development, articles do not provide substantive evidence of what the product is and what the product does. Therefore these articles are speculative, not reliable (unlike AirPower_(charging_mat)). XVDC (talk) 11:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. WP:CRYSTAL is not a blanket ban on future products, in fact it specifically states Predictions, speculation, forecasts and theories stated by reliable, expert sources or recognized entities in a field may be included... The sources provided are reliable (CNET, Macworld, International Business Times, Business Insider, Tom's Hardware [is the nominator even trying to impeach these?]), and there continues to be even more reporting on this in connection with the fall 2020 product reveal cycle. Just a random example, Tom's Guide four days ago or Indian Express a week ago  . All in all this seems to be a nom based on misunderstanding of WP:CRYSTAL. ☆ Bri (talk) 14:28, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * comment IBT is unreliable. Business Insider is questionable. WP:RSP. Graywalls (talk) 00:39, 19 September 2020 (UTC) forgot to notify Graywalls (talk) 19:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep - It is a device that was created by a large company, and has plenty of sources. Granted, the article definitely needs work. Foxnpichu (talk) 23:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: The key youtube video, per is now  I presume zX4xvkJDHVw, has been (re)-loaded and this version does not contain Airtags at the appropriate location, 1m 42s.  While my personal probability assessment is Apple has been developing a product codename Airtags and let it slip in a support video showing a developmental IOS version.  I am somewhat also inclined to hope the article creator, who seems not a one-off fly by night, checked the video before a take down.Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:48, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 12:55, 3 September 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:06, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete the certainty seems weak. Graywalls (talk) 00:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 23:20, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: I'm seeing recent articles such as .Djm-leighpark (talk) 06:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.