Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AirX


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:36, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

AirX

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Still nothing at all actually substantial for the needed substance. SwisterTwister  talk  05:02, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:05, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:05, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:05, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

 References  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment – Below are some sources. North America1000 06:06, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 19:13, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- no claim to notability and sources presented at the AfD are not convincing. These are mostly PR-driven or trivial mentions. Insufficient to pass GNG and CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:08, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. non notable nonscedules airline with purely incidental coverage.  DGG ( talk ) 04:50, 28 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.