Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Canada Express Flight 7804


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Air Canada Express Flight 7804

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be a pretty insignificant incident; no major injuries, no hull loss TheLongTone (talk) 13:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Minor and not notable aviation incident....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:18, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:20, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:20, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:20, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:20, 21 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Seems to be a minor and non-notable aviation incident. - Ahunt (talk) 13:41, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Certainly doesn't meet WP:NEVENT. The fact that the author didn't think the year of the accident was worth including inadvertently testifies to the short-term thinking here. ubiquity (talk) 15:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * delete WP:NOTNEWS. No fatalities nor major impacts. LibStar (talk) 15:53, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep I think its a bit too soon to consider this article for deletion, especially since this incident just happened last night. Also, more details are emerging about the crash now, and the crash landing did lead to some structural damages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RehmanK786 (talk • contribs) 16:03, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: WP:TOOSOON is a reason for deletion, not a reason to keep an article in case it becomes notable in the future. - Ahunt (talk) 16:15, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOTNEWS. New, but still needs to satisfy WP:GNG. If somthing about it becomes notable, then we can have an article on it, but right now it doesn't satisfy the necessary criteria. — crh 23   &thinsp;(Talk) 17:05, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Why do these authors think that an encyclopaedia wants or needs an article on every little non-event? Certainly NOT NOTABLE--Petebutt (talk) 13:10, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge content into the article on Exploits Valley Air Services, the operator of the flight. For that article, this would be a significant detail, worthy of a few sentences.  However, a stand-alone article is not needed.  --RFBailey (talk) 15:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Exploits Valley Air Services; not Notable for a stand-alone article and there is nothing to merge, because the Exploits Valley Air Services article already has identical content to the article under consideration. YSSYguy (talk) 14:52, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely unnotable.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 21:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia does not keep an article about every minor aviation incident that occurs at all — if people had died in this incident, then there would probably be a case for an article about it, but if everybody survives with only minor injuries at worst then enduring notability just isn't there. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing else convincing to suggest a solid article. SwisterTwister   talk  22:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.