Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Charter Advisors, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 03:50, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Air Charter Advisors, Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no evidence of notability except PR & notices in trade magazines; apparent coi editor.  DGG ( talk ) 01:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Article has enough notable sources, and isn’t written with an improper tone. Where are the conflicts of interest? ElonTesla (talk) 02:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * See SPI. Unscintillating (talk) 00:49, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 02:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 02:26, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 02:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 02:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)


 *  Delete Sources are not reliable as most are not independent secondary or third party sources. Those sources are either booking sites, company profile sites or its own homepage. Only the trade magazines are credible. As for the notability, it is quite vague. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 07:13, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - What a guy on the phone matching trips with operators? Nothing new. Nothing that belongs in an encyclopedia. Rhadow (talk) 14:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - no indications of notability or significance; basically spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:39, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 *  Delete - No indications of encyclopedic notability from independent reliable sources. Seems like a WP:NCORP / WP:NPOV problem. Not seeing anything worthy of inclusion here. Shelbystripes (talk) 07:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable; fails WP:Corp. Trivial. Kierzek (talk) 16:40, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Existence is not notability. Lots of trivial coverage in sources that do not seem reliable and/or are based on press releases. The Bloomberg and San Francisco Chronicle "coverage" (which would be the only sources that would potentially be reliable) consists of nothing more than passing mentions. -- Kinu  t/c 18:34, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with above, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing ++ 14:32, 28 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.