Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Charter Service (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  11:08, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Air Charter Service
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article about a company, not properly sourced as passing WP:CORP. As always, companies are not "inherently" entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH on the quality and volume of their sourcing -- but this is referenced entirely to press releases and short blurbs in limited-circulation trade publications, and shows absolutely no evidence of substantive coverage in GNG-worthy media. Note, for the record, that this article was raised as a WP:WAX argument in Articles for deletion/Production Air Charter -- but, of course, the fact that this article is badly sourced doesn't mean that other article has to be kept, it means this article needs to be deleted. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the company from having to have better sourcing than this. Bearcat (talk) 12:49, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom. Bearcat (talk) 12:49, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Limited-circulation trade publications are sufficient as long as they are reliable sources (independence, editorial oversight, etc.) per WP:RS.
 * That said, like even big media, trade publications also publish recycled press releases which are not reliable.
 * The article's current refs are recycled press releases.
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 14:59, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:40, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - it seems like a fairly sizeable company and there might be more sources somewhere, but everything I'm seeing is very shallow and consists mostly of quotes from executives. (As A. B. wrote, probably recycled press releases.) LittlePuppers (talk) 05:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete brochure advertising articles. No reedeming features. Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND and specifically WP:SIRS.   scope_creep Talk  10:08, 7 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.