Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Dravida


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 18:41, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Air Dravida

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Was once a contested PROD, but I still cannot see any significant coverage in reliable third-party sources, which are needed to pass WP:CORP. This is a failed airline project, which was founded and shut down again in November/December 2005. so the encyclopedic impact should be very low. Only sources to be found are either trivial directory entries proving that the company existed, or some news snippets describing the initial intentions. That's just not significant. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 09:50, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Week keep The airline does get a number of pertinent hits on Google so I am giving it the benefit of the doubt for the moment. The article needs to be expanded though, or it is likely to be re-nominated for deletion. Travelbird (talk) 17:30, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, C T J F 8 3  chat 00:50, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Wifione    .......  Leave a message  13:31, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep A few internet searches reveal plenty of non-trivial news coverage. However the article clearly needs expansion with more assertions of notability for it to be prevented from being re-nominated. A bit of help with a translation from an Indian-language article on the subject would likely be of enormous help. --§ Pump me up  13:55, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.