Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air France Flight 463


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. If this becomes more notable later than it can be recreated, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. The Bushranger One ping only 22:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Air France Flight 463

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Might have been events are not particularly notable for a stand-alone articles MilborneOne (talk) 13:58, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. MilborneOne (talk) 14:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:46, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:46, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:46, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:46, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTNEWS....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:12, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTNEWS.User:Emigdioofmiami, If we were to make an article for every hoax, then 20% of wiki would be dedicated to hoax (not really, but it would be overloaded with junk articles) Emigdioofmiami (talk) 16:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:AIRCRASH - no damage done, no people hurt, no learnings for air safety, not a novel kind of incident, no political ramifications. Leondz (talk) 19:13, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, not notable as mentioned above. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 20:15, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, only a small hoax. No air traffic halted or anything like it--Planecrashexpert (talk) 21:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:GNG etc. etc.--Petebutt (talk) 21:53, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - per above. Maybe speedy delete per WP:SNOW. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 01:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * WP:SNOW delete per above. ansh 666 05:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment Depending on if a political group or organisation claims responsibility for the hoax, or is accused of involvement this incident could be more broadly notable. Seems a very quick rush to judgement AusLondonder (talk) 07:36, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - this incident can be adequately handled at the Air France accidents and incidents article. It is not notable enough to sustain a stand-alone article. Mjroots (talk) 17:30, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable, a note on the Air France's accidents and incident page is sufficient. --Zerbey (talk) 20:59, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.