Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air France flight 6745


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:13, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Air France flight 6745

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable hull loss of a cargo flight. Doesn't merit a standalone article. ...William 11:14, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions....William 11:18, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions....William 11:18, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions....William 11:18, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions....William 11:18, 9 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete already mentioned in Boeing 747 hull losses and the airport article but not really notable enough for a stand-alone article. MilborneOne (talk) 11:37, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - where does it state that cargo aircraft hull losses are non-notable. There are many articles on cargo aircraft hull losses on Wikipedia. It was a hull loss, therefore it meets the guide WP:AIRCRASH. Article needs a bit of expansion, but needing improvement is never a reason to delete. Mjroots (talk) 22:04, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. It is standard WP:CONSENSUS that only the most severe and sustainedably notable non-passenger-airline crashes are given stand-alone articles. This fails to rise to the level where a stand-alone article is appropriate, as there is no WP:PERSISTENCE; the WP:GNG is not met. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:52, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. The coverage in the Boeing 747 hull losses encapsulates this information quite well, as MilborneOne stated. Scud47 (talk) 01:40, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.