Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air India 101


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Air India 101

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Just a single event where the ILS and some non-mechanical systems on the plane weren't working. The pilot obviously talented,can see and it was a major airport on a semi cloudy day,he can land with little difficulty. Based on the description, and the coverage of the event, doesn't seem that significant to have its own article. A mention in the plane model(777)'s incidents section might be enough Daiyusha (talk) 05:36, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 05:58, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 05:58, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 05:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 05:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: The plane landed safely and there were no injuries. Johndavies837 (talk) 00:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as this fails the criteria contained in WP:EVENT. If required, the text contained in the article may be salvaged and merged with List of accidents and incidents at John F. Kennedy International Airport and/or Newark Liberty International Airport. It appears that the fact that there were no casualties also weighs in heavily on the issue of notability, as while the incident did receive some in-depth coverage in the mainstream media in India at the time of the incident,,,, , , the subsequent lack of sustained national and international coverage (WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE) demonstrates that the event did not have a WP:LASTING impact, which is a condition precedent to demonstrate notability for events. — Nearly Headless Nick   {c}  20:57, 17 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.