Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Kharkiv


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 06:38, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Air Kharkiv

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

I couldn't find any reference that this airline exists or existed, so it obviously gained all but the significant coverage in reliable third-party sources, which is required to pass WP:CORP. It occured to me that it might be a mix-up with Aeromist-Kharkiv, but this seems unlikely as this Air Kharkiv was allegedly founded in 1992, not in 2002 like Aeromist. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 09:06, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * comment. No mixup. Kharkivskii avialinii operated on passenger lines under its own name until 2001, then went belly up and finally liquidated in 2008 along with 18 other state-owned regional companies. When the court ruled for liquidation (July 2008) it still owned seven Tu-134 and six An-26. Good riddance. East of Borschov 20:32, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, could you please give the source for this piece of information? Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 21:30, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, well, Ukrainian press where else. Here's a more-or-less complete roundup (in Russian). Note that the same court almost simultaneously handled the case of Aeromist-Kharkiv (ICAO AHV; our title subject was ICAO:KHV). Fleet in 2008 . Financials for 2009 . A lot of noise and no firm statements that it was (when?) a real flying airline and not a junkyard of dead Tu's.East of Borschov 22:17, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:13, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:05, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:23, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:26, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per the lack of reliable sources. This unsourced article fails Notability and Verifiability. Cunard (talk) 08:58, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.