Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Myanmar (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. no valid reason for re-nomination. WP:NAC is only an essay, while WP:BURO is solid policy. You want to change policy, don't do it by pointy AfDs. Scott Mac 17:20, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Air Myanmar
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Renominating because of an improper non admin closure. Shadowjams (talk) 09:35, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * As I said before, it has to be assessed whether the information given in this article is notable at all. If it's not, then the article is to be deleted. If it is, I think the content would be much better suited in the article of whichever company had this idea. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 13:19, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.