Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airashii hana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Jamie S93 ❤ 22:44, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Airashii hana

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Has vandalism components, needs copyedit and re-organization badly, may not be notable. iBen 03:01, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MADEUP. Appears to be about someone's unpublished manga.  Also fundamentally unencyclopedic, and may lack sufficient clarity and context to identify the subject of the article and allow other editors to meaningfully expand. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:35, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, no reliable sources found.  Anna Lincoln  08:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lots of mangas started of with strong amateur work by unknown artists, so it's possible that this'll take off someday. And if it does, and enough reliable sources notice that it does, then an article might be appropriate. Right now, though, not so much. It's clear what the subject is (moreso after a quick wikiformatting spree), but do Manga fall under CSD A7? The article doesn't appear to assert notability. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:06, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Even if the verifiability issue is solved that is still a "home-brew" manga which fail the applicable guideline WP:BK. --KrebMarkt 16:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Contents cannot be verified through reliable sources. A Filipino comic using a Japanese title about a Japanese protagonists in a Japanese setting is a red flag that this may be a hoax. —Farix (t &#124; c) 16:48, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- —Farix (t &#124; c) 16:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unpublished? Not a chance. --Gwern (contribs) 21:37 12 February 2010 (GMT)
 * Delete as per WP:MADEUP. Ought to be snowballed to put it out of its misery. --DAJF (talk) 03:21, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not the place to promote the work you hope to write someday. Edward321 (talk) 19:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.