Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airbus A380


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Boeing 747. (non-admin closure) —&thinsp; J 947  (user &#124; cont &#124; ess), at 00:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Airbus A380

 * – ( View AfD View log   )

It has sadly been proven that the plane is too big and too expensive to be operated economically. And now with Airbus announcing that production of the plane will end next year, it is perhaps but appropriate that we ground our article on our favorite gentle giant for similar reasons. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:13, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all Airbus planes. If it ain't Boeing, I ain't going.  Sounder Bruce  02:51, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Because pollution is bad. Koridas  ( Speak ) 03:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete — Too big; cannot fit in my computer. userdude 05:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete because airplanes are useless right now. Renerpho (talk) 09:25, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Goofily large aircraft are a key prophecy about the end times. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊  13:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Bankrupt all airlines and destroy the Airbus. Donald Trump is making his own airline. EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW... (PorkchopGMX) (t - c) 13:59, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Uranus because that is the obvious choice. Or prehaps 42 (number) as that is the Answer to Life, Universe and Everything. -KAP03 (Talk &#x2022;&#x20;Contributions &#x2022;&#x20;Email) 16:13, 1 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.