Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aircraft Maintenance Engineer (India)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 00:52, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Aircraft Maintenance Engineer (India)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is essentially a condensed reprint of bureaucratic regulations,   retaining all the details of the bureaucratic language. It's not encyclopedic, and there are no third party references. An article on this topic might be appropriate, but probably not separate articles country by country in this fashion  DGG ( talk ) 00:38, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 08:22, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 12 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Comment: "Aircraft Maintenance Engineer" is a certified trade regulated by a government agency in India, hence the India-specific article. Similar to Aircraft maintenance engineer (Canada) and disambiguated at Aircraft maintenance engineer. Capitalization of this article should agree, I think. Ivanvector (talk) 04:15, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:36, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

 *Keep There is no doubt that aircraft maintenance engineer is a notable occupation. If it is felt that the similarities between countries are greater than the differences then there could be a new article into which this and Aircraft maintenance engineer (Canada) could then be merged if desired. But the editor of such a general article should consider that it is essentially the same trade as Aircraft maintenance technician, which article is written from a US standpoint with Europe added as an afterthought, which is really not the right approach. A root and branch editing job could be undertaken by somebody who knows the subject, but national differences would need to be noted and there is no ground for deletion of this article there. As for the style, that is again not relevant to deletion, and I would add as an aside that there are many Indian users of the English Wikipedia and we all (including those of us who are not of Indian origin) hope that many more Indian specific articles will appear. Indian English has differences of style and idiom from US or British English, and that is especially true in official usage. That is not to say that contributors may not need, or appreciate, help in casting articles in an appropriate style as we all do, but WP:ENGVAR applies. --AJHingston (talk) 11:04, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Commment. That's great, but this fails WP:42. Gm545 (talk) 16:58, 2 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. All sources are primary. No indication that the subject is notable enough to have had secondary articles written about it. Gm545 (talk) 16:56, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only based on primary sources, and would need a complete rewrite to read as an encyclopedia article. No objection to a competent recreation.  Sandstein   12:29, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.