Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airi L


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge and redirect to When Love Takes Over. (non-admin closure) Ritchie333  (talk)  (cont)   08:19, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Airi L

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is going to sound extremely odd coming from me because I've written all five of the other articles in Category:Cover artists and she passes WP:MUSICBIO criterion #2. But I feel that there is not enough information known about her to justify a standalone article; it is all about When Love Takes Over. Usually, when a cover artist has a hit with a pre-release cover version of a song we redirect that article to the section of the song on the subject, take Ameritz Karaoke for an example, that redirects to Run (Snow Patrol song). Spark Productions redirects to Wake Me Up!. I believe that merging the content into When Love Takes Over (which is currently in two bits across the page) would be an excellent application of WP:IAR. (For the record; Venus Palermo is a vlogger and Precision Tunes' cover of Payphone was the subject of many newspaper articles. The other three had more than one chart hit so a redirect is inappropriate.) Laun  chba  ller  09:46, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 23 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment. Could you clarify - are you proposing deletion or a merge to the article on the song? --Michig (talk) 16:31, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I am proposing a merge to the song.-- Laun  chba  ller  09:05, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree that a merge would be appropriate but this isn't really the right venue as you're not proposing deletion. I would be inclined to boldly merge it and then start a merge discussion on the articles' talk pages if there is any objection. --Michig (talk) 18:36, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Alright, I've gone ahead and merged.-- Laun  chba  ller  22:13, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.