Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airport CEO (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The notability arguments haven't been addressed: "Neutral, reliable or accurate information" on their own do not make a topic notable, the information needs to be substantial and independent as well Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:17, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Airport CEO (video game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Originally tagged as proposed for deletion. The rationale (which I stand by) was " It's too soon to have an article about a game that's still under development and has no announced release date." Given the fact that the developer is not that well-known, there's an absence of reliable third-party sources discussing the game so it fails to meet Wikipedia's notability criterion. Pichpich (talk) 17:45, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:46, 4 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Game lacks any coverage in WP:VGRS as in this search. Delete. --Izno (talk) 17:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as an un-released game by a new studio, it can't be notable based on its own promotional material. WP:CRYSTAL. Power~enwiki (talk) 19:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Thread consists of neutral and reliable information from the community, although the wiki page is a bit early. The game will be released soon though. Clearly not self-promotional, and provides accurate information. I know the game will be released very soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:183:4100:83F:29EF:12C3:3F3D:1E73 (talk) 00:16, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per SPAM. Seems very self-promotional. Maybe TOOSOON as well. It might be okay at some point in the future to recreate this, but it's not kosher now. South Nashua (talk) 18:16, 6 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.