Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airport Express (Sydney)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Feel free to set up a redirect to the relevant merged page, though. Mailer Diablo 01:29, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Airport Express (Sydney)
No point in having a single page for one bus route, especially one that was discontinued several years ago SM247 02:57, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag_of_Texas.svg|30px]] 03:45, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 03:57, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 04:07, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as defunct bus route although it might warrant a brief mention on the Sydney Airport article under transport links. Capitalistroadster 05:50, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 05:50, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. though note it seems to have survived a VfD decision almost a year ago but the page isnt there -- Astrokey44 |talk 11:52, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn bus route and does not need an article on its own. --Ter e nce Ong 14:52, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Sydney Buses. Was a distinctive separate service outside the normal fare structure. JPD (talk) 17:36, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Arnzy (Talk) 09:07, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Ian &equiv; talk 09:54, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge with Airport and East Hills railway line, Sydney. Bus routes have history, just as streetcar and rail routes do. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates! ) 13:24, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I have merged it, so if this is deleted it should be redirected. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates! ) 13:27, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree that a redirect is a good thing, but surely this should be merged with Sydney Buses, who ran the service, not a railway line article? The Sydney Buses article as a whole could do with some expansion. JPD (talk) 12:48, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree that a redirect is a good thing, but surely this should be merged with Sydney Buses, who ran the service, not a railway line article? The Sydney Buses article as a whole could do with some expansion. JPD (talk) 12:48, 24 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.