Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airrosti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 23:27, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Airrosti
INVALID WITHDRAWL BY NOMINATOR, DISCUSSION IS STILL OPEN. THANK YOU. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contributions)

AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is written like an advertisement. This possibly is not notable. Support Per nomination as nominator. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contributions) 16:06, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:16, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:16, 15 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep This article is about a company. This page was originally a redirect to manual therapy. Airrosti is a company, not a massage technique. Also this is not written as an advertisement. What was stated was fact. It is the same as stating "Apple inc. is an American multinational technology company headquartered in Cupertino, California, that designs, develops, and sells consumer electronics, computer software, and online services." Here is a link to the company's Better Business Bureau page' Sneasel talk 16:32, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment it does not appear to be written as an advertisement, and even if it was that would require cleanup not AfD. With regards to notability, the article is not well sourced but there are plenty of news stories which probably pass WP:CORPDEPTH. Polyamorph (talk) 08:25, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 June 23.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 06:22, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep needs work but not an afd. Not written as an advertisement as per nominator.User:Davidstewartharvey
 * Weak delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Just because the company exists doesn't mean that it's notable. There's coverage in texas publications like CBSAustin and san antonio press news that doesn't substantiate notability per WP:AUD, neither does a paragraph or maybe two in Dallas magazine. I cannot read the San Antonio Biz Journal, but my guess is that it doesn't substantiate notability outside of the locality, particularly given that bizjournals.com is a domain known because it "churns out press releases and propagates native advertising for companies". Active Life DC doesn't seem to be reliable. The rest of coverage consists of passing mentions like this and this. The BBB profile accredits around 400,000 local businesses, meaning that it doesn't establish notability also. It's unreasonable to think a redirect to a target that doesn't even mention the company would help whatsoever. To meet NCORP I'd expect multiple non-local publications covering it that are unambiguously not promoting the product. The San Antonio Press News is perhaps the best coverage, but it really isn't enough by itself. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:52, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Good analysis by Eddie891 and I would add that none of the references contain "Independent Content" including the bizjournals reference which relies entirely on an interview with company executives. References fail WP:ORGIND as they have no "Independent Content". I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 19:53, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - sourcing is weak, local, in passing, and/or referenced to clients. Bearian (talk) 17:12, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 20:50, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't see how the sources listed establish notability, even taken in total. The San Antonio Express-News article is the only source that is both reliable and significant coverage. The Dallas Magazine article is reliable, but not significant in the context of notability. Everything else is either an unreliable source, primary source, or a truly trivial mention. –Darkwind (talk) 00:36, 10 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.