Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airveyor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Conveyor system. Term seems to be used, valid redirect.  Jujutacular  talk 14:01, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Airveyor

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Is basically an advertisement. - ComradeSlice(talk) 22:19, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2011 December 13.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  06:08, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * KEEP. ComradeSlice suggests this is an advert, but if that's the case it's not a very good one since it *does not* mention any brand names or specific products. More likely it's just a badly written article. Keep, but rewrite / add more content. =//= Johnny Squeaky 06:35, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:PRODUCT. coverage is hardly indepth. LibStar (talk) 07:09, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 22:25, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as spam. Stedrick (talk) 17:35, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge with Conveyor system. Biscuittin (talk) 23:46, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.