Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aisa Kyon Hota Hai?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) Cavarrone 08:11, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Aisa Kyon Hota Hai?

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability for any of these films. All of these articles were created by Chandasmani, who was blocked as a sock puppet of Sulthan ameer. One of these, Faulad, had an earlier AfD that was closed as no consensus. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:33, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment all of these could be upgraded to start class with rs reviews but it would take a lot of work as they are not notable in their current state except for Faulad which improved and I would favour keeping, but the reality is that they all excluding Faulad qualify for speedy deletion G5 as they were created by a blocked sockpuppet and they have not had significant edits from other editors except Faulad which has, unless others disagree Atlantic306 (talk) 23:46, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep moving to keep and improve all, as they all seem to have had a national release there should be offline sources, also there is nothing even slightly contentious or blp like so there is not an immediate demand for references, but there is still the sockpuppet problem. Atlantic306 (talk) 16:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:17, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:17, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:00, 24 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 21:36, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all per WP:V. It's unclear who would improve these articles which are now mostly uncited. IF these films are indeed notable someone (not a sock) would come along and create articles on them. WP:PROMO also applies; clearly created for promotional purposes. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:42, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep all and improve with the multiple available sources. To simply wonder who or when they will be corrected is a somewhat WP:IMPATIENT way to not build an encyclopedia, and I can only suggest that complaining is not a solution. For instance, I found it quite easy to take the nominated Aisa Kyon Hota Hai? and expand and source it. Sheesh. Stubs do not have to remain stubs.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 22:52, 16 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.