Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aisha Muhammed-Oyebode (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Owen&times; &#9742;  14:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Aisha Muhammed-Oyebode
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The person does not meet the GNG/ANYBIO criteria. The sources are poor, and general notability is not demonstrated BoraVoro (talk) 13:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Likely passes AUTHOR with book reviews here and . Oaktree b (talk) 13:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: She's also discussed in this book chapter . Another review of her book here:  Oaktree b (talk) 13:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, Women, Education,  and Nigeria. &#8213;  "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  16:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: This is a straight pass of WP:NAUTHOR. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: How are richly cited Nigerian sources poor? The article is opposite the rationale from the nominator. It meets the least minimal consideration for any article and are supported by reliable sources. For the general notability guidelines, we shouldn't be discussion the later because it has been done many times. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 16:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't think she qualifies as an author—her only book is a collection of interviews. Other reliable sources cover her but do not demonstrate why she is important as a businesswoman or civic leader. I don't see how this person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in a specific field or similar. --BoraVoro (talk) 07:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Per WP:NAUTHOR, the book has also eared on reviews and multiple Nigerian sources. see some in, , and . There is also WP:GNG where all the contents are supported by reliable sources. To crown it all, these are type of deletion discussion that yield nothing than keep for the past years. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 13:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.