Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aisquith Presbyterian Church


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy deleted as a blatant copyvio of http://www.aisquith.org/history.htm. cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Aisquith Presbyterian Church


Non-notable church building. Page was prodded and second prodded. Tags removed by page author MNewnham 01:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep What an interesting old church! Besides, all churches are inherently notable -- Librarianofages 01:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Nothing in Google news to indicate that anything notable ever happened in this church, and a "normal" Google search shows a fair number of hits, but while it existance can be confirmed the normal interpretation of the verification standard looks for more than this. Unless the facts can be confirmed from multiple third party sources, this article cannot be shown to be unbiased and thus violates Wikipedia's core principles. - 152.91.9.144 02:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete-find barely anything on this church, seems not to meet notability or be mentioned in reliable sources. Seraphimblade 03:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I do not agree that "all churches are inherently notable" you said the same think about schools. There is nothing notable about this one.   Missvain 03:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 05:25, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep 160+ year old church. Edison 05:49, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Most individual churches are not notable. --Metropolitan90 07:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not all churches assert notability. There is really a need to introduce a special criteria for places of worship. --Ter e nce Ong (C 08:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless they can substantiate any level of notability.SkierRMH 09:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.