Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajay Lobo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 07:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Ajay Lobo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:Before on Google News has nothing apart from routine coverage and his interviews. Google Scholar and JSTOR have nothing about him.
 * Source 1 - Music listing
 * Source 2 - Movie listing
 * Source 3 - Movie listing on Rotten tomatoes
 * Source 4 - is a book authored by the subject
 * Source 5 - looks like a comic?

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR and WP:NMG. Jeraxmoira (talk) 08:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers,  and Music. Jeraxmoira (talk) 08:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete additional search at ProQuest pulled up nothing. Mach61 (talk) 17:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Quite apart from anything else, this should never have been published in the first place, on account of the author's paid-editing status. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * yes i have mentioned as paid as per wikipedia community guidelines for paid. Wikipedia i have read carefully Wikipedia guidelines on paid Wikipedia has been Mention you need to mention on your profile that's your Doing paid editing and i am following guidelines of Wikipedia i am not violating aby Wikipedia guidelines.
 * Thank you Surajsinghl (talk) 14:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Right. Other than socking... -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:17, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly a vanity page Nswix (talk) 17:14, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: If this isn’t paid editing, this is clearly a vanity page. Search engines don’t pull up ratios relevant to the subject, and the sources don’t say much either. HarukaAmaranth  春香 18:04, 1 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.