Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajay Puri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 03:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Ajay Puri

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Courtesy completion of nomination for User:Bihco Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  14:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Makes some dubious assertions of notability, but cannot back the claims with sourcing. Edward321 (talk) 15:03, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems notable, quick google search gives me and . That is just a very quick glance at the results, this person seems completely notable to me, though the article deserves expansion.  Theseeker4 (talk) 15:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Had a look at the 2nd ref and it is full of gramical errors and is a blog, are blogs now suitable for use as refs in wikki?? Bihco (talk) 19:17, 11 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Although I completed the AfD as a courtesy, I'm going to weigh in on the keep side. I originally added The Times of India ref while reviewing the article before the AfD. I've since added another ref as well. I'm not thrilled with Theseeker4's second ref, but the first one has merit. Although short, it mentions an invitation by the Itailian government to speak, several honors, and a planned book. Add this to the other refs, and notability should definitely be satisfied.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  19:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notability established the usual way. No need for an exception that I can see. Otherwise, rationale-less nom does little to advance cause. Wily D  19:59, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 20:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 20:12, 15 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.