Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajit's 50th movie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nja 247 10:08, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Ajit's 50th movie
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I declined the speedy on this, as crystalballing isn't a valid criteria. However, this seems to fail WP:CRYSTAL. It's just a bit too soon for this article. -- Ged UK  12:36, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, but should be recreated closer to the date of release, as more info becomes available. Thanks,  Genius  101 Guestbook  13:25, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Wow, this is the first time I've seen a WP:HAMMER type title applied to something other than an album. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 21:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - No, it's not: on Articles for deletion/Wii 2, you said, "I have since annotated WP:HAMMER to include any unverifiable articles of a similar manner." So it isn't the first time the Hammer rule has been used for a non-album. (Plus, I also used it earlier this month - but I can't remember which one.) DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  10:07, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 00:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hopeless crystal ballery that fails WP:NFF by a country mile. PC78 (talk) 00:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —  Salih  ( talk ) 05:26, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Might have been notable if more was known about the production, but so far we're missing the title, any cast except Ajit and we aren't told any plot. Fails to be informative and fails inclusion guideline about future films. - Mgm|(talk) 07:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete What if Ajith decided to stop at 49, did the article author consider that? Indeed, a Hammerific title with vague and few sources within the crystal.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 09:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I've warned this user several times not to create such articles. This definitely isn't the first time. Also he needs to be informed what sort of images are allowed on Wikipedia articles and what are not. Eelam StyleZ (talk) 02:13, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.