Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajit Agarkar Appreciation Society

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:47, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Ajit Agarkar Appreciation Society
Ajit Agarkar-cruft, what is the world coming to? Seriously, definitely not encyclopedic. For those who don't know (and you wouldn't guess from the article) Ajut Agarkar is a very average Indian cricketer. Not notable, not encyclopedic, vanity. Delete. Smoddy (tgeck) 14:16, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Give us a chance. Not many recognize the achievements of AAAS. We do. AAAS
 * Unsigned comment by 203.187.228.35 (talk &middot; contributions)

Delete Nichalp 20:44, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, promo. Megan1967 05:14, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unnotable, vanity, webpage advertisement. --Kitch 12:51, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This from the talk page: Dont delete the page. AAAS is a widely love Ajit Agarkar fan group.

How anyone can consider deleting such a renowned group as the AAAS I'll never know.

I vote for the AAAS to STAY

Message from AAAS

We plan on updating this page to be an in-depth info not only about our society, but also Ajit Agarkar.

A lot of people don't recognize the wonder-boy's achievements, which is exactly why we want to bring awareness about it.

AA might not have many fans, but we'd be obliged if we're given a chance.

I suggest the info about Agarkar you want to submit goes to Ajit Agarkar. As for the society, come back when (if) you are notable. Smoddy (tgeck) 14:43, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm sorry but your group is simply not promenient enough to be included in an encyclopedia. However, Ajit Agarkar is! Have you considered devoting your time to improving his article? Maybe even work it up to a featured status? What better way could you show your appreciation to Mr. Agakar than by taking the time and effort to improve his article to featured status and giving it the opportunity to be featured on the main page and seen by thousands of people arounf the world? -JCarriker 14:52, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with JCarriker. —Markaci 2005-03-26 T 16:16 Z

I'd heard of Agit Agarkar, but I never really knew about his acheivments until the AAAS enlightened me, without them my life would feel empty, they definately deserve to be in the encyclopedia. - Dave
 * Comment by 81.153.128.202 (talk &middot; contributions)


 * Delete. Mr. Agakar is notable. His fan club is not. DaveTheRed 18:39, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Information on an Ajit Agarkar fan club belongs in the Ajit Agarkar article until such time that the fan club can show independent notability. --Allen3 19:34, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)


 * Okay, I say we work on the Ajit Agarkar page, and then keep a small section for AAAS on that. Still, not fair to delete the supporting statements on this page, but yes, I think well first work on the Agarkar page, get huge, and then come back. Popasud
 * Comment by 203.187.228.35 (talk &middot; contributions)
 * Delete fan clubs are not notable Dsmdgold 19:39, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.