Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajit Gunewardene


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Keep. Eluchil404 (talk) 05:19, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Ajit Gunewardene

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

PROD contested, elevating to AFD as the subject does not seem notable, despite author's protestations. delete UtherSRG (talk) 17:47, 19 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. See here and here. There appears to be plenty of sources which can be used, and they appear to define his notability in Asian business circles. --Haruth (talk) 22:31, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong deletebeing a business people or managing directer is not notable.Those positions will be change by subject to subject.  if it is, why don't we give permission to create pages all business man in all over the world. I strongly  proposed to delete this article under G11.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wipeouting (talk • contribs) 04:43, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 *  delete Article should delete ASAP because this description is not useful public users .--Anilpresantha (talk) 07:57, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * FWIW, "usefulness" or lack thereof is not one of the valid reasons to keep or delete an article. DGG ( talk ) 06:21, 30 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. - enough sources exist to pass WP:GNG--Sodabottle (talk) 14:46, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notable individual. Also LMD is a major publication, and their profiling of his shows sufficient media coverage. A few other sources, Bloomberg, Business Week. -- snowolf D4  (  talk  /  @   ) 13:49, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Chairman of major companies and organizations -- like in this case a stock exchange, are notable. Not all businesses; it depends on the business. As different people take the position, they each of them become considered permanently notable.  DGG ( talk ) 06:21, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep It is verified that he was Chairman of a national stock exchange.. That's notable.--Mkativerata (talk) 07:12, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.