Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajit Nazre (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus  DGG ( talk ) 06:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Ajit Nazre
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a businessman, written like a résumé and making no strong claim of notability under our inclusion rules for businesspeople. The referencing here, further, is parked almost entirely on primary sources, with the only two reliable sources being one article which namechecks his existence in the process of failing to be about him, and one deadlinked article whose content I can't verify at all. As usual, he's not entitled to a Wikipedia article just because he exists -- a person earns one by being the subject of enough media coverage to satisfy WP:GNG, but that hasn't been demonstrated here. Note that this is the same person as the first deletion discussion, though the article is written differently enough this time that I don't feel comfortable speedying it as a recreation of deleted content. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 16:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  19:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  19:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as there's barely anything here especially for any applicable notability, would've been imaginable G4. Notifying 1st AfDers, and .  SwisterTwister   talk  05:51, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete researcher who lacks significant coverage. I know people with more than 7 patents who are no where near notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.