Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajit Someshwar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. AmiDaniel (talk) 09:32, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Ajit Someshwar
Non-notable, vanity page ImpuMozhi 04:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Nomination: The page was PROD-tagged, but the creator of the page (a rank newcomer) himself removed the PROD tag. I have just copyedited the page thoroughly, and it reads better now, but that does not make it notable. Google brings up only 18 hits for "Ajit Someshwar" and some of them are mirror-sites. The page editorializes on the Indian diaspora and proclaims that the said gentleman is writing a book. Well, if and when it is published, he will become notable.

Note that the larger, Florida-based "CSI Consultants" should not be confused with this person's smaller, Canada-based outfit, which appears to be basically the usual body-shopping rigout. ImpuMozhi 04:37, 8 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. ImpuMozhi 04:37, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Not quite notable enough, and 12 google hits confirmed that —M e ts501 talk 04:28, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable.--Peta 06:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - First write the book and get it published with a real (non-vanity) publisher. Get famous to get on Wikipedia. Not the other way around. - Andre Engels 08:15, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Who is this guy - annonymous
 * Comment on nomination. Removing the Prod is exactly the right thing to do if the poster thinks it's inappropriate.  Bringing it to AfD is exactly the right thing to do if someone thinks the Prod should have been there.  No vote.  &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 18:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Right, I take the point, and have made a small amendment to my nomination above. Thanx, ImpuMozhi 02:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.