Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akagami no Shirayukihime


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Akagami no Shirayukihime

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not pass WP:BOOK or WP:NOTE. To coverage by reliable, third-party sources could be found. See prod for main article, Akagami no Shirayukihime. Prod was disputed by an IP who simply added references to the publisher's or retail websites. —Farix (t &#124; c) 20:23, 5 June 2014 (UTC)


 * I actually found reviews from manga-news and animeland. I'll vote for keep if the major contributor is interested in fixing the article up quickly with my overview; or an experienced editor is interested in taking this up. DragonZero  ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 00:07, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 6 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, generally, a manga series with 11 volumes published as books is almost guaranteed to be notable and verifiable. There are Japanese-language publications that review pretty much every professionally-released manga, so sources almost certainly exist. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:52, 6 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Doing my best to clean up the page (I'm the creator)...someone did some pretty awful editing in addition to moving the references I had used previously to external links...fixing that now. As far as the reliability of the (former) references, since this manga has yet to be licensed in English, it's slightly more difficult to find reliable sources, which is why I used AnimeNewsNetwork as one, after seeing it referenced in various other manga pages. After I finish up, would appreciate feedback on whether or not the references are fine--actually, for manga that has no anime nor an English license, what kind of references are appropriate? AnSPage (talk) 20:06, 6 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Reliable sources have been found covering it. And Starblind has a great point also.   D r e a m Focus  05:29, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Someone forgot to add this:
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --  D r e a m Focus  05:30, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.