Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akashaganga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Akashaganga
Not a notable term and not sure if its encylopedic. NicM 20:31, 11 January 2006 (UTC).
 * Transwiki to Wiktionary. Some mention on new-age websites, may be true.  But article is inaccurate ("Indian"?  which language?  Hindi? Tamil?).  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-11 22:45Z 
 * Keep per Gurubrahma's expansion. Good job.  (Wiktionary can still have the dicdefs.)  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-12 09:56Z 
 * Transwiki Keep after Gurubrahma work. utcursch | talk 05:19, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep- The word has several meanings; I have converted it into a disambiguation page. --Gurubrahma 09:44, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Good job. I'm convinced: Keep. NicM 13:34, 12 January 2006 (UTC).
 * Keep per GB =Nichalp   «Talk»=


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.