Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akbar Khan Qureshi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:48, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Akbar Khan Qureshi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Apparently non-notable social entrepreneur. No hits on Google News. I just created this article as a move from category space, per Categories for discussion/Log/2013_April_8. However, when I then speed-read it, it seemed to be full of WP:PEACOCK phrasing ... and the assertion of notability that I had thought I had spotted in the opening sentence was misleading. It says that Quershi is "current Ambassador of India for Nations United", which I misread as the United Nations. In fact, "Nations United" is Qureshi's own venture. The article was created by, whose had previously created the page in article space where it was deleted as a result of a PROD. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:33, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete It doesn't look to me that Nations United is the subject's own project, as he is not listed here. But anyway, the award from them can not be regarded as notable, and I have found no wider evidence (Google, Higbeam, Questia) that the subject is notable. AllyD (talk) 21:02, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Found one hit for this individual on a website I've never heard of called "Faces for Transformation." I'm not sure the single source regarding developments in...ahem...goat farming qualify as a notable subject. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:20, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.